LONDON — India has the chance to alter the course of cricket history when it faces host England in the Women’s World Cup final at Lord’s Sunday.

Since the tournament’s inception in 1973 — two years before the men’s World Cup started — it has been dominated by England and Australia, with New Zealand, in 2000, the only other country to have won the event.

The final sees this year’s edition come full circle, with India having upset the form book to beat England by 35 runs in the tournament opener in Derby on June 24.

“It isn’t going to be easy for England,” promised India captain Mithali Raj after her side’s stunning semifinal win over six-times champions Australia in Derby Thursday.

A 36-run victory over the title-holder was built on Harmanpreet Kaur’s stunning 171 not out.

An innings full of correct yet powerful shots ought to have banished any remaining stereotypes about ‘demure’ women’s cricket in general and the India team in particular.

Certainly there was nothing ‘ladylike’ about the fiercely competitive Kaur’s angry reaction toward batting partner Deepti Sharma after almost being run out on 98.

For Raj and India pace bowler Jhulan Goswami, the leading run-scorer and wickettaker in women’s One-Day International history respectively, this could be the last chance the two 34-year-olds have to win the World Cup.

But the significance of the day goes far beyond what it means to their cricket careers.

India’s win in the 1983 men’s World Cup final at Lord’s turned the country on to limited overs cricket and led the world’s second-most populous nation to become the sport’s financial powerhouse.

An India win Sunday could have equally far-reaching consequences, as Raj acknowledged.

“It’s an opportunity for the Indian team to make it big in India,” Raj, appearing in her second World Cup final 12 years after her first, told ESPNCricinfo.

“Everybody will be glued to the television Sunday,” she added while recalling how India’s 98-run defeat by Australia in the 2005 final at Centurion, South Africa, was not even broadcast.

“If we can pull it off, there will be nothing like it. It will help the future of women’s cricket.”

One pleasing aspect for India of this World Cup is that they have not been over-reliant on Raj and Goswami, who nevertheless produced the delivery of the tournament to bowl Australia captain Meg Lanning for nought in the semifinal.

The likes of Smriti Mandhana, Punam Raut and Sharma have also stepped up when needed.

England, since its opening defeat by India, has had the potentially useful experience of winning two close games, defeating Australia by three runs in pool play before seeing off South Africa by just two wickets in a semifinal where it stumbled chasing a modest target of 219 in Bristol Tuesday.

England captain Heather Knight is one of several seasoned campaigners along with bowlers Jenny Gunn and Katherine Brunt.

But Sarah Taylor, who took heart from the way England had scrapped hard for wins, has arguably been the team’s star performer.

“We can take a lot of pride into this game regardless of what’s going to happen,” Taylor said.

“We’ve worked really hard to get here and we’ve fought like anything.”

Taylor underlined her standing as the best wicketkeeper in the women’s game with a superb stumping in a semifinal where she also made 54.

Her performances have been all the more impressive given Taylor spent 12 months out of the game with anxiety issues.

“A year ago I wasn’t even thinking that I could potentially play cricket again, so this is massive,” Taylor said, adding she now relished the prospect of appearing in a final in front of a sold-out crowd of more than 26,000 at ‘the home of cricket’.

“You want to play at Lord’s, you want to play in a World Cup final and you want to play in front of a packed house — that’s the situation you want and we’ve got it.” — AFP