British activist convicted in Thai defamation trial

British activist convicted in Thai defamation trial

September 21, 2016
devicer
devicer



BANGKOK — A British activist was found guilty of criminal defamation on Tuesday and given a suspended jail sentence over a report alleging abuses in Thailand’s lucrative fruit industry — a verdict the UN described as “very disturbing.”

Andy Hall, who lives in Thailand, has seen a series of legal actions for contributing to a 2013 report on a Natural Fruit factory in the south of the country, alleging poor working conditions, low wages and child labor.

On Tuesday he was found guilty of defamation and breaching computer crime laws in a private prosecution filed by Natural Fruit.

Hall, 36, was given a three-year suspended sentence and fined 150,000 baht ($4,300), his lawyer Nakhon Chomphuchat said.

Rights groups say criminal defamation and computer misuse laws are routinely used to stifle investigative work in Thailand.

The country’s reputation as a major supplier to global food chains has been tarnished by persistent allegations of labor abuses, especially against cheap and vulnerable migrant workers.
Both Natural Fruit, a private company and major supplier to the European drink market, and Thai prosecutors have brought separate actions against Hall.

The United Nations’ Human Rights Office for South-East Asia said the ruling was “very disturbing.”

“It would have been more appropriate to conduct an independent and thorough investigation into the serious allegations raised in the Finnwatch report,” acting regional representative Laurent Meillan said in a statement.

The contentious report — “Cheap Has a High Price” — was published by the Finnish civil rights group Finnwatch.

It heaped pressure on Thailand’s food industry.

Western companies have faced increased pressure to vet their supply chains and ensure their Thai exports are slavery-free.

But scandals keep emerging, while those who document abuses often face a backlash.

Brad Adams, Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said international companies should “take a real hard look at whether they want to source anything from Thailand going forward” following the ruling.

Natural Fruit has denied the allegations in the report and has also launched a civil case seeking $10 million in damages.

Hall, who said he will appeal the verdict, stands by his research and has accused the company of trying to detract from the report’s findings.

Speaking after the trial on Tuesday, Hall said the verdict “shows people are not free or at liberty to do this kind of research.”

“There’s a huge problem with human trafficking in Thailand. There’s a huge problem with labor exploitation,” added the activist, who in recent years has also drawn attention to abuses in Thailand’s shady fishing and poultry sectors.

The president of Natural Fruit was in unforgiving mood after the ruling.

“No foreigner should think they have power above Thai sovereignty,” said Wirat Piyapornpaiboon.

In a statement, Finnwatch said they took “full responsibility” for the report’s contents, adding Hall had been personally targeted “in order to stifle other voices that speak out legitimately in support of migrant worker rights.”

Hall was acquitted by a court last year on a separate defamation charge pursued by Thailand’s attorney general.

In his statement, the UN’s Meillan said at least 10 human rights defenders have been slapped with prosecutions this year in Thailand.

One recent case includes a trio of researchers in the insurgency-plagued “deep south” over a report they wrote documenting torture allegations against the Thai army. — AFP


September 21, 2016
HIGHLIGHTS