US fires missiles at Assad airbase; Russia denounces ‘aggression’

US fires missiles at Assad airbase; Russia denounces ‘aggression’

April 08, 2017
A still image taken from a video broadcast on Syrian state television on Friday, shows a Syrian army airbase that was hit by a US strike near the city of Homs, Syria. — Reuters
A still image taken from a video broadcast on Syrian state television on Friday, shows a Syrian army airbase that was hit by a US strike near the city of Homs, Syria. — Reuters

PALM BEACH, Fla./MOSCOW/BEIRUT — The United States fired cruise missiles on Friday at a Syrian airbase from which President Donald Trump said a deadly chemical weapons attack had been launched, the first direct US assault on the government of Bashar Al-Assad in six years of civil war.

In the biggest foreign policy decision of his presidency so far, Trump ordered the step his predecessor Barack Obama never took: directly targeting Assad’s military as punishment for the chemical weapons attack which killed at least 70 people.

That catapulted the United States into a confrontation with Russia, which has military advisers on the ground assisting its close ally Assad. “Years of previous attempts at changing Assad’s behavior have all failed and failed very dramatically,” Trump said as he announced the attack from his Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago, where he was meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack,” he said of Tuesday’s chemical weapons strike, which Western countries blame on Assad’s forces. “No child of God should ever suffer such horror.”

The swift action is likely to be interpreted not only as a signal to Russia, but also to other countries such as North Korea, China and Iran where Trump has faced foreign policy tests early in his presidency.

The Syrian army said the US attack killed six people at its air base near the city of Homs. It called the attack “blatant aggression” and said it made the United States a “partner” of “terrorist groups” including Daesh (so-called IS). Homs Governor Talal Barazi told Reuters the death toll was seven.

A spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin said the strike had seriously damaged ties between Washington and Moscow. Putin regarded the US action as “aggression against a sovereign nation” on a “made-up pretext”, spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

Russian television showed craters and rubble at the site of the airbase and said nine aircraft had been destroyed.

US officials said they had taken pains to ensure Russian troops were not killed, warning Russian forces in advance and avoiding striking parts of the base where Russians were present.

Western allies of the United States spoke out in support of the decision to launch the strikes. Several countries said they were notified in advance, but none had been asked to take part. Iran, Assad’s other main ally, denounced it.

US officials described the attack as a one-off that would not lead to wider escalation, and Syrian officials and their allies also said they did not expect the attack to lead to an expansion of the conflict.

“No doubt this will leave great tension on the political level, but I do not expect a military escalation. Currently I do not believe that we are going towards a big war in the region,” a senior, non-Syrian official in the alliance fighting in support of Assad who declined to be identified told Reuters. For years, Washington has backed rebel groups fighting against Assad in a complex multi-sided civil war under way since 2011 that has killed more than 400,000 people. The war has driven half of Syrians from their homes, creating the world’s worst refugee crisis.

The United States has been conducting air strikes against Daesh militants who control territory in eastern and northern Syria, and a small number of US troops are on the ground assisting anti-Daesh militias. But until now, Washington has avoided direct confrontation with Assad.
Russia, meanwhile, joined the war on Assad’s behalf in 2015, action that decisively turned the momentum of the conflict in the Syrian government’s favor.

Trump’s decision to strike Syrian government forces is a particularly notable shift for a leader who in the past had repeatedly said he wanted better relations with Moscow, including to cooperate with Russia to fight Islamic State.

However, Trump had also criticized Obama for setting a “red line” threatening force against Assad if he used chemical weapons, only to pull back from ordering air strikes in 2013 when Assad agreed to give up his chemical arsenal.

Russian media long portrayed Trump as a figure who would promote closer relations with Moscow. At home, Trump’s opponents have accused him of being too supportive of Putin.

On Friday, a warplane hit the town of Khan Sheikhoun where Tuesday’s chemical attack took place. An activist working at an air raid warning service in opposition areas told Reuters it caused only material damage.

Tuesday’s attack was the first time since 2013 that Syria has been accused of using sarin, a banned nerve agent it was meant to give up under the Russian-brokered, UN-enforced deal that persuaded Obama to call off air strikes four years ago.

Tomahawk missiles were fired from the USS Porter and USS Ross around 0040 GMT, striking multiple targets — including the airstrip, aircraft and fuel stations — on the Shayrat Air Base, which the Pentagon says was used to store chemical weapons.

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the strike did not mean the wider US policy on Syria had changed.

“This clearly indicates the president is willing to take decisive action when called for,” he told reporters. “I would not in any way attempt to extrapolate that to a change in our policy or our posture relative to our military activities in Syria today. There has been no change in that status.”

The attack was a “one-off,” a US defence official told Reuters, meaning it was expected to be a single strike with no current plans for escalation.

US allies were strongly supportive of the US.strikes. French Foreign Minister Francois Ayrault said: “The use of chemical weapons is appalling and should be punished because it is a war crime.”

Over the previous few months, many Western countries had been quietly backing away from long-standing demands that Assad leave power, accepting that rebels no longer had the power to remove him by force. But after the chemical weapons attack on Tuesday, several countries said Assad must go.

A Foreign Ministry official in Saudi Arabia hailed US President Donald Trump as “courageous” for taking action when “the international community has failed to put a halt to the regime’s actions.”

In a joint statement, French President Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Assad bore “sole responsibility” for the US strike following the suspected chemical attack.

The close American ally, Britain said it “fully supported” the strikes, judging them an ‘appropriate response to the barbaric chemical weapons attack’. It said the strikes were “intended to deter further attacks.”

Turkey welcomed a US missile strike on a Syrian regime and called for a no-fly zone in the country to prevent further bloodshed. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s spokesman Ibrahim Kalin said the strike against the Sharyat airbase in Homs, northern Syria, was “a positive response” to the “war crimes” of the Assad regime.

Beijing offered a nuanced reaction, saying it was “urgent” to avoid “further deterioration of the situation.” A Foreign Ministry spokeswoman added: “We oppose use of chemical weapons by any country, organization or individual in any circumstance, for any purpose.” — Reuters


April 08, 2017
HIGHLIGHTS