BRUSSELS — Members of parliament in Denmark have passed a law that will see asylum seekers sent to countries outside of Europe to have their cases considered.

The legislation — which was approved by 70 votes to 24 on Thursday — is the latest anti-migration measure passed by the Danish parliament and aims to discourage migrants from ever setting foot in the country.

Under the law, which was proposed by the Social Democrat-led government, Denmark would be able to transfer asylum seekers to detention centers in partnering countries, potentially outside Europe. Their cases would then be reviewed from those countries.

The United Nations' refugee agency, UNHCR, had warned against "exporting" the asylum process, with assistant high commissioner Gillian Triggs warning that "such practices undermine the rights of those seeking safety and protection, demonize and punish them and may put their lives at risk".

The bill's passage comes as part of a widespread crackdown on immigration in Denmark that has seen a tightening of immigration rules over recent years.

Last month, Copenhagen signed a memorandum of understanding with Rwanda about immigration and asylum issues. At the time, the government played down suggestions its asylum seekers could be sent to the African country as "speculation".

But the memorandum itself was clear about Denmark's long-term goals.

"The vision of the Danish Government that the processing of asylum applications should take place outside of the EU in order to break the negative incentive structure of the present asylum system," it read.

Immigration advocates slam bill

In a statement sent to Euronews, a UNHCR spokesperson said the agency "remains firmly opposed to national initiatives that forcibly transfer asylum-seekers to other countries and undermine the principles of international refugee protection".

"UNHCR is very disappointed that Denmark is continuing to pursue this vision, despite the serious concerns we have raised," they said.

"We will continue to encourage Denmark to build on its active participation in global refugee cooperation and to help find common European solutions to the challenges facing Europe in terms of both the reception and protection of refugees," the spokesperson said.

Charlotte Slente, secretary-general of the Danish Refugee Council, condemned the bill's passage, asserting in a statement that "the idea to externalize the responsibility of processing asylum seekers’ asylum claims is both irresponsible and lacking in solidarity".

"We have repeatedly called on the Danish Members of Parliament to reject this bill. Similar models, such as the Australian model or the so-called ‘hotspots’ on the Greek islands, have involved serious incidents of detention, physical assault, slow asylum proceedings, lack of access to health care and lack of access to legal assistance," she said.

Slente added in the statement that it is unclear how a third country reception center could be administered as Denmark has a "legal responsibility" to safeguard the rights of asylum seekers and refugees.

"It has also been one of our main concerns regarding the bill, which has now unfortunately been passed without adequate consideration," she said.

"The fact is that the parliament has voted on a bill which paves the way for a potential asylum processing model that does not yet exist and which they, therefore, do not know what actually entails. This means that the parliament has effectively voted in the blind."

'Shameful abdication of responsibilities'

In a statement published on Twitter, Amnesty International's European Institutions Office condemned the news, calling the development a "gross and shameful abdication of responsibilities from Danish politicians".

"Denmark, a rich country, should not try and pay its way out of inalienable international obligations to people seeking safety," the organization said.

Speaking with Euronews in a phone interview, spokesperson Lisa Blinkenberg said Amnesty EU was "really disappointed" by Thursday's decision.

"The whole idea of Denmark just saying 'no' to its international obligations is really outrageous, so we are really disappointed today," she said.

Blinkenberg said Amnesty EU also shares in UNHCR's concerns that sending asylum seekers abroad could lead to human rights abuses.

"How can Denmark ensure that respect for human rights is upheld?" she said. "We don't think that Denmark can ensure that human rights will not be violated with this process."

Denmark, Blinkenberg said, would have an "obligation" to monitor the care provided to asylum seekers and to determine that their human rights were being protected.

She questioned how the country would go about monitoring the care provided to asylum seekers and how Denmark would be able to "ensure that asylum seekers have access to a lawyer, to a complaints system, to a doctor" and other resources. — Euronews